In addition, the following, also from here, does not seem to be correct: Tests show that Zotero/citeproc-js formats the "Jr." in [Smith][John Jr.] just like a (second) given name, whereas [Smith][John, Jr.] formats it as expected for a suffix. So should this read "with a comma"?
Generational designations (like “Jr” or “IV”) immediately follow the given name without a comma. All other suffixes should follow next, with each suffix preceeded by a comma.
Finally, "Particles as part of the last name", with the example "family" : "\"van der Vlist\"" is no longer contained in the new docs either.
Has any of these features been removed, or are they just absent from the new docs?
Some details on name parsing that used to be described in http://gsl-nagoya-u.net/http/pub/citeproc-doc.html no longer appear in https://citeproc-js.readthedocs.io/en/latest/csl-json/markup.html – in particular the
comma-suffixtag and the,!shorthand.In addition, the following, also from here, does not seem to be correct: Tests show that Zotero/citeproc-js formats the "Jr." in
[Smith][John Jr.]just like a (second) given name, whereas[Smith][John, Jr.]formats it as expected for a suffix. So should this read "with a comma"?Finally, "Particles as part of the last name", with the example
"family" : "\"van der Vlist\""is no longer contained in the new docs either.Has any of these features been removed, or are they just absent from the new docs?