Closed shinji257 closed 8 months ago
There is nothing much to link to, the URL you've included doesn't even link to ASF, moreover, I couldn't find any way to give a precise link either, probably because your scoop service doesn't support one.
I don't see much value at this point of including that info, especially since ASF meets criteria for main scoop package (which would give it more of an official status), but isn't one. Together with the fact that there is nothing linkable there, I prefer to wait for either of those two to happen first.
All good. I rechecked the link and apparently it does not actually bring it up. I checked it but I didn't do it in a fresh tab so apparently it kept some data between "loads". It's in their extras bit (an official bucket) so I do think they are doing it themselves as part of their automated packaging. Just a thought.
Their package entry does link back to you if you search for it. I just wish it was something that was actually linkable.
Hence why I said either of above. We don't want to link to general service but to specific package in that service as a way for user to easily find/install/whatever given stuff. Right now I find almost zero value in saying "ASF is available for installing on scoop", because if anybody uses scoop, they can already use search on it, and with no link there is little way to highlight that.
Checklist
Wiki page
https://github.com/JustArchiNET/ArchiSteamFarm/wiki/Third-party
The issue
Just wanted to let you guys know someone has been packaging ArchiSteamFarm (Windows build) on Scoop.sh. This is not my package but figured it could be a good idea to have it on the packaging list.
Here is the link: https://scoop.sh/#/apps?id=99c30913457f9db0f34963dea0defbf1a22d0041
Wrong text
No response
Suggested improvement
Additional info
No response