Closed Vangelis66 closed 2 years ago
So, according to your test, does it work well for 52.9.2022.*
?
Basilisk v52.9.2022.01.27
is on par with latest Pale Moon v29.4.4
, as far as the underlying UXP platform is concerned, so yes; of course, no-one can tell how this EoS build will behave after 6 months or more, but since the previous Basilisk release (v52.9.2021.12.13/14
) is still compatible with the extension "installation-wise", why should the latest one not be?
If, OTOH, you're asking if a maxVersion
of 52.9.2022.*
will allow the extension installation out-of-the-box, then yes, too ... 😃
Thanks. The release asset is updated. BTW, it should be LTS instead of EOL.
Official Basilisk browser by MCP is one this extension natively supports (along with Pale Moon & Seamonkey);
https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=27845 https://www.basilisk-browser.org/releasenotes.shtml https://www.basilisk-browser.org/download.shtml
The EoS (End-of-Service) binary officially released (64-bit only, requires at minimum Win7 SP1) has an
appVersion
of52.9.2022.01.27
, but because ofhttps://github.com/JustOff/github-wc-polyfill/blob/0a94bdaecf1e0de77a966ebb64d45fe321225a81/install.rdf#L25
this extension won't install there (without manually tinkering with the
install.rdf
file 😉 ...); thus,maxVersion
should be now raised to52.9.2022.*
to allow for such an installation to proceed :smile: ...Kindest regards.