soc-se-bot
commented
6 days ago Team's Response
Response will be Rejected as stated in the CS2103T website, due to deliberate sabotage.
Furthermore, a deliberate (monetary) value of 28 digits is an impossible value in real life.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Deposit Amount input is reflected differently on GUI
Description when editing a contact rental information, input values does not correspond to the deposit value show in gui.
Steps to reproduce redit 1 r/1 d/9999999999999999999999999999
Expected The deposit amount for the rental information we edited to be $9999999999999999999999999999.00
Actual It instead started with a 1 rather than a 9
Screenshots
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2425S1/pe-interim#1593] [original labels: severity.Low type.FunctionalityBug]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Response will be rejected as stated in the CS2103T website, due to deliberate sabotage. In addition, a deliberate (monetary) value of 28 digits is an impossible value in real life. Refer to the image below:
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
## :question: Issue response Team chose [`response.Rejected`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
Description Editing the rental amount to a large number would cause the amount on the GUI to vary from input amount
Steps to reproduce redit 2 r/1 m/99999999999999999999
Expected Monthly rental amount to be $99999999999999999999.00
Actual But it starts with a 1 rather than a 9. Essentially different amount.
Screenshots