search

JvanKatwijk / qt-dab

Qt-DAB, a general software DAB (DAB+) decoder with a (slight) focus on showing the signal
http://www.sdr-j.tk
GNU General Public License v2.0
299 stars 62 forks source link

Spectrum and waterfall diagrams are not on same vertical position #302

Closed andimik closed 10 months ago

andimik commented 1 year ago

Jan, I would be great, when the vertical position for the waterfall is the same like in the spectrum. Currently it's a bit shifted to the left.

See screenshot.

image

JvanKatwijk commented 1 year ago

I changed it, the 4 large elements in the widget are now formatted as "grid"

Op za 30 sep 2023 om 09:48 schreef andimik @.***>:

Jan, I would be great, when the vertical position for the waterfall is the same like in the spectrum. Currently it's a bit shifted to the left.

See screenshot.

[image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24510556/271761210-babaa0c1-a842-4eed-adff-4473aa4de557.png

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JvanKatwijk/qt-dab/issues/302, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCPHQANY2DKMCCJ7PWL7ELX47FE3ANCNFSM6AAAAAA5NMGWQM . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

-- Jan van Katwijk

andimik commented 1 year ago

No, this did not help, it's still not in the same vertical position:

grafik (see screenshot, taken with 6.25)

Do you really need the label on the 2nd axis?

JvanKatwijk commented 1 year ago

I'll have a look tomorrow

Op di 7 nov 2023 om 20:20 schreef andimik @.***>:

No, this did not help, it's still not in the same vertical position:

[image: grafik] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24510556/281156645-129f9d73-1322-49dd-9ac0-fc63092e9617.png (see screenshot, taken with 6.25)

Do you really need the label on the 2nd axis?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JvanKatwijk/qt-dab/issues/302#issuecomment-1799680927, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCPHQDDFA6MDNJX75T7RVDYDKCWBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5NMGWQOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTOOJZGY4DAOJSG4 . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

-- Jan van Katwijk

JvanKatwijk commented 1 year ago

That does not solve the problem completely, but would be a reasonable approximation

Op di 7 nov 2023 om 20:46 schreef jan van katwijk @.***>:

I'll have a look tomorrow

Op di 7 nov 2023 om 20:20 schreef andimik @.***>:

No, this did not help, it's still not in the same vertical position:

[image: grafik] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24510556/281156645-129f9d73-1322-49dd-9ac0-fc63092e9617.png (see screenshot, taken with 6.25)

Do you really need the label on the 2nd axis?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JvanKatwijk/qt-dab/issues/302#issuecomment-1799680927, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCPHQDDFA6MDNJX75T7RVDYDKCWBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5NMGWQOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTOOJZGY4DAOJSG4 . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

-- Jan van Katwijk

-- Jan van Katwijk