What I did:
I set up the implementation for dynamic mapping. This involves getting the brewery data and setting up pins on the map for each brewery. (Some did not have latitude and longitude so they were excluded for now).
I currently have the map re-rendering on the first breweries location with a "zoom level" of 10. We can all discuss how we want this handled at a later date.
Did this break anything?
[x] No
[ ] Yes
Type of change
[x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Styling
[ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[ ] Refactor(DRY-ing up/ reorganizing code, etc.)
[ ] Super small fix (Corrected a typo, removed a comment, etc.)
[ ] Skip all the other stuff and briefly explain the fix.
Checklist:
[ ] If this code needs to be tested, all tests are passing
[x] The code runs locally
[ ] There are comments where clarification/ organization is needed
[x] The code is DRY. If it's not, I tried my best
[x] I reviewed my code before pushing
What's next?
Deciding on how we wish to handle the search results ( as in quantity, where to center the map, ...etc)
banjaminh
commented
1 year ago
What I did: I set up the implementation for dynamic mapping. This involves getting the brewery data and setting up pins on the map for each brewery. (Some did not have latitude and longitude so they were excluded for now).
I currently have the map re-rendering on the first breweries location with a "zoom level" of 10. We can all discuss how we want this handled at a later date.
Did this break anything?
Type of change
Checklist:
What's next? Deciding on how we wish to handle the search results ( as in quantity, where to center the map, ...etc)