Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
http://i.imgur.com/QG6dYoQ.jpg
Original comment by onewayd...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2014 at 4:10
Attachments:
Missing icons seem like the result of a conflict between sigplus stylesheet
rules and the stylesheet rules of your template. Such conflicts can only be
resolved by looking at the live page and using the browser web inspector tool
to find out what rules are applied to the elements in question, namely, the
previous, next and close buttons. I guess the template forcibly overrides
styling for these controls, which makes them disappear.
Closing the dialog by clicking outside the window has been disabled in the
mobile version for user experience reasons. However, you can still close the
pop-up window by double-clicking the image, which works both on the desktop and
on mobile devices.
Original comment by huny...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2014 at 8:53
[deleted comment]
Was there a major change in the CSS from version 1.4.x to 1.5.x? The stable
version works fine on the template.
I inspected the element through Chrome and the image appears to not be linked.
Are the buttons generated by some different scripting in 1.5, and is that
blocked because of some template setting?
sample page:
http://www.project9designs.com/index.php/transformers/works-in-progress/masterpi
ece-megatron/125-masterpiece-megatron-2
1.5
#boxplus .boxplus-controls>.boxplus-next{background-image:url(/)}
1.4
#boxplus .boxplus-controls>.boxplus-next{background:transparent
url(/plugins/content/sigplus/engines/boxplus/popup/css/buttons.png) no-repeat
scroll 0 0;}
Checking the plugins/content directory, there is no boxplus directory. Only
'caption', 'lightbox' and 'rotator'. Lightbox directory only contains php
files for the different engines.
Original comment by onewayd...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2014 at 4:28
There have been major changes in sigplus 1.5.x compared to 1.4.x. Essentially,
1.5.x is a complete re-write of the application.
In sigplus 1.4.x, images are referenced via regular URLs. This can be
relatively costly for small images because the browser has to initiate an HTTP
request for each and every image, the request and response headers being almost
as last large as the image payload, which is quite inefficient. In sigplus
1.5.x, small images are embedded directly in the CSS file via so-called data
URIs, which is the recommended approach for referencing small images as it
requires only a single HTTP request and response to fetch all stylesheet
content.
Some templates use a so-called minifier (or CSS compressor), which concatenates
all CSS files into a single file. Unfortunately, some of these minifiers have
trouble processing data URIs. Yours seems to omit such URIs entirely. Because
data URIs are now ubiquitous, I strongly believe it is the responsibility of
template developers to ship their template with a minifier that can process
data URIs; this really is not difficult. Otherwise, you can probably switch off
the minifier on the template configuration page, which will prevent boxplus CSS
data URIs (and data URIs by other extensions) from being destroyed.
boxplus CSS files reside in the "media" directory, which follows how the Joomla
framework separates PHP server-side script files from stylesheet and JavaScript
files.
Original comment by huny...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2014 at 6:24
Thank you. It was the compression function of the template that caused the
problem. Though, double clicking/tapping on Android still does not close the
image for me. Tested on Chrome and stock browser. The enlarge/resize icon
also does not function for me on Android.
A side question, are there no options yet to control the icons and their
visibility? On Android/mobile, I would like to hide the overlay navigation
arrows, since they're persistent with their visibility rather than mouse-over
visibility on PC (same with Captions). Because mobile swiping is available and
functions well, I would want to hide these from view to encourage swiping and
also not block the photo view. I would also want to hide the resize icon since
it's not functioning - or even if functioning, I think the swipe support would
prevent you from being able to move/scroll the larger image into view.
Thanks again!
Original comment by onewayd...@gmail.com
on 25 Sep 2014 at 2:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
onewayd...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2014 at 3:45