Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
Original comment by huny...@gmail.com
on 5 Jul 2012 at 5:40
[deleted comment]
I'm sorry. What does it mean?
"Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement"
But I can set the plugin preferences SigPlus?
Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com
on 18 Jul 2012 at 8:37
No. Currently, sigplus supports overlay captions only, which cover part of the
image with a semi-transparent background and on which caption text is printed.
Making a tool-tip appear instead of an overlay caption requires additional work
on my part. This is what "Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement" means (added
by Google Code). I have removed the label "Type-Defect", hence the negative
sign in front of it, indicating that the issue is not about a supported feature
that does not work as expected but rather, as "Type-Enhancement" would suggest,
the positive sign in front of it indicating label addition, a new feature
proposal to be added to the extension. This helps me prioritize issues: bug
reports (defects) get priority over feature requests (enhancements). Robustness
in sigplus is extremely important. The reliability of sigplus can only be
guaranteed if any time a bug is found, we track it down, and smite it in its
infancy, before it would go on a rampage and wreak havoc on the software. :)
Original comment by huny...@gmail.com
on 18 Jul 2012 at 9:36
[deleted comment]
:)
In that case, I'm looking forward ;)
Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com
on 18 Jul 2012 at 9:40
By the way.
Well, if the flow options (many thumbnails per page) you can search the title
or description of the photos with the CMD + F on your browser.
So that the viewer has included in this search results page titles, file names,
captions, displayed pictures in the gallery A search page.
Reagrds!
Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com
on 10 Aug 2012 at 10:16
As of sigplus version 1.5.0.199, the lightbox pop-up type "hoverplus" and the
caption template mechanism should be powerful enough to address the original
issue. Since "hoverplus" is a lightbox engine, settings for the caption engine
(and the presence of a corresponding title text) control whether the overlay
caption appears, independently of the mouse-over pop-up ("tool-tip") service of
the engine "hoverplus". "hoverplus" accepts JavaScript options in the same
fashion as other engines do.
The text search integrated into most browsers (alias "CMD + F") is fully under
the control of the particular browser. There is nothing Joomla extensions can
do to register (or un-register) themselves, or what text the browser finds.
(Most browsers search only in visible text.) sigplus, however, integrates into
Joomla's (database-backed) site search, which indeed looks into image title,
description, metadata, etc. and displays results accordingly.
Original comment by huny...@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2013 at 10:22
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Hooverplus - suuuuupppper!
I'm interested in yet another solution.
Display description to the title and description of the photo.
When I log in to the amdin Jooomla!> Sigplus displayed hints of parameters in a
balloon (preview attached).
I would like to view the gallery wall type of thumbs, when you hover the cursor
over the thumbnail appeared in the description balloon pictures as determined
in accordance with the definition * as in the lightbox. (example attached).
* It is also important that, in the absence of file labels.txt balloon appear
in the file name and the rest as in the Lighbox.
Best Regards!
Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com
on 14 Dec 2013 at 9:07
Attachments:
In the last version 1.5.0.199 it works like this.
Can it be improved?
Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com
on 14 Dec 2013 at 12:50
Attachments:
"[...] sigplus, however, integrates into Joomla's (database-backed) site
search, which indeed looks into image title, description, metadata, etc. and
displays results accordingly. [...]"
— I understand. But how to create a joomla search box only for this one
visible side?
Original comment by ten.mari...@gmail.com
on 14 Dec 2013 at 12:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ten.mari...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2012 at 1:22