search

KABA-CCEAC / angular.CQRS

AngularJS module to provide CQRS integration on clientside
18 stars 3 forks source link

Is there any sample application that shows how to use this in practice? #8

Open aziz opened 8 years ago

aziz commented 8 years ago

Is there any sample application that shows how to use this in practice?

adrai commented 8 years ago

No, this project is abandoned :-(

aziz commented 8 years ago

Did you guys abandoned angular? or CQRS and event sourcing? or both? Could you please give some feedback on using angular as the front-end consumer of a DDD app.

adrai commented 8 years ago

We replaced angular with react + reflux

Il giorno 30-dic-2015, alle ore 15:36, Allen Bargi notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> ha scritto:

Did you guys abandoned angular? or CQRS and event sourcing? or both? Could you please give some feedback on using angular as the front-end consumer of a DDD app.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/KABA-CCEAC/angular.CQRS/issues/8#issuecomment-168012101.

aziz commented 8 years ago

Any particular reason to choose react/reflux over angular sorry to bother but I'm trying to persuade our team to move to react/redux for the DDD app as well. I would love to hear your experience.

adrai commented 8 years ago

reflux or redux (in general flux based libs) fits better to CQRS. Angular fits more to data driven apps (master/detail views) Everything is action, store or component. In angular (at least v1) you have more stuff (directives, templates, controllers, views, etc...), and the bigger your app grows the more stuff you have to learn...

Il giorno 30-dic-2015, alle ore 15:46, Allen Bargi notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> ha scritto:

Any particular reason to choose react/reflux over angular sorry to bother but I'm trying to persuade our team to move to react/redux for the DDD app as well. I would love to hear your experience.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/KABA-CCEAC/angular.CQRS/issues/8#issuecomment-168013669.