Open msesboue opened 2 years ago
Section 1, Introduction, page 2, first sentence typo: "relationshps"
Section 1.1.2, page 5, paragraph 1: "into a one large query" --> "into one large query" or "into a single large query" Sec 1.2.2 p 11 par 1 : "There may multiple addresses" --> "There may exist multiple addresses" Sec 1.2.2 p 11 par 1 :"how a business users see the world" --> "how a business user sees" or "how business users see" Sec 1.3.4 p15 par 1 : "objects, look like and how they behave" --> "objects, how they look like and how they behave" Sec 1.4 p 16 par 3 : "an schema-matching" --> "a schema-matching" Sec 1.4 p17 par 1 : "and knowledge scientist." --> "and a knowledge scientist." or "and knowledge scientists."
Sec 2.2.6 p 27 par 2 : "upon identitier" --> "upon identifier" Sec 2.2.6 p 27 par 2 : "serve a global join keys" --> "serve as global join keys" Sec 2.2.6 p 29 par 5 : "we could change the prefix [...] would make" --> "changing the prefix [...] would make" Sec 2.3 p 31 par 1 : "antecedant" --> "antecedent" Sec 2.3 p 32 par 2 : "and Custom Mappings" --> "and Custom Mapping" Sec 2.3.1 p 32 par 2 : "columns are using in the template" --> "columns are used in the template" Sec 2.3.3 p 39 par 3 : "The mapping rule would represented" --> "The mapping rule would be represented"
Sec 2.2.7 Scenario 3: "(Address)-state->[string]" is redundant/confusing, as State is now a concept and stateName is an attribute.
Sec 2.3.1 Example 2.4 resulting kg schema and kg: there are two "entity_id" attributes with the same representation. I know the book is not using verbose IRIs or anything, but I would expect these distinct concept attributes, which happen to both have a range of [int], to have different notational representations.
Sec 2.3.2, par 2: "of a concepts"
Sec 2.3.2 Example 2.5: "(customer-1)" should be "(customer-100)", "(customer-2)" should be "(customer-101)", as per the entity_id values in the table given.
Sec 3.2.1 p 51 par 2 : "Define a query needs to be defined that returns" --> "Define a query that returns" or "A query needs to be defined that returns" Sec 3.2.4 p 57 par 2 : "the distinct rows that represents" -> "the distinct rows that represent" Sec 3.2.4 p 57 par 3 : "The column status contains the status of the order..." etc -> Seems this phrase is out of place. Sec 3.3.1 p 59 par 2 : (Order) -currency-> [string] -> (Customer) -name-> [string] Sec 3.3.9 p 73 Figure 3.16 : SELECT customer_id -> SELECT entity_id Sec 3.3.9 p 73 Figure 3.16 : 'Paypal' as method -> 'Visa' as method Sec 3.4.1 p 80 par last : "from Order to an Address" -> "from Customer to an Address" Sec 3.4.3 p 85 Fig 3.22 : "without duplicates" -> "with duplicates" Sec 3.4.8 In several places across the section: "bidrectional" -> "bidirectional"
Chapter 4 p 97 par 1 : "with knowledge graphs schemas" -> "with knowledge graph schemas" Ch 4 p 97 par 1 : "A common expectations is" -> "A common expectation is" Sec 4.1.2 p 99 par 5 : "KPIs metrics" -> "KPI metrics" Sec 4.1.2 p 99 par 5 : "the data products is" -> "the data product is" Sec 4.1.2 p 99 par 5 : "adopoted" -> "adopted" Sec 4.2 p 100 par 7 : "Tradition data tools" -> "Traditional data tools" Sec 4.2 p 100 par 7 : "can consumer" -> "can consume" Sec 4.2 p 101 Table 4.1 : "this the business" -> "this business" Sec 4.2.1 p 102 par 4 : "A tabular data products" -> "A tabular data product" Sec 4.2.2 p 104 par 2 : "straightforward to due" -> "straightforward to do" Sec 4.2.2 p 104 par 2 : "given that knowledge report" -> "given that the knowledge report" Sec 4.3.2 p 124 par 1 : "to designing" -> "to design" Sec 4.3.3 p 126 par 5 : "the knowledge grah" -> "the knowledge graph" Sec 4.3.4 p 128 par 1 : " in a graph databases" -> "in a graph database"
Sec 6.3 p 133 par 1 : "responsability" -> "responsibility"