KSP-RO / ProceduralParts

A continuation of StretchySRBs, which is a continuation of StretchyTanks
71 stars 79 forks source link

Nose Cones need to be revised #171

Closed khr15714n closed 5 years ago

khr15714n commented 9 years ago

While small procedural are cheap large ones are expensive in relation to stock ones. Nose cones are more or less hollow and basing costs on volume (costPerkL) seems not appropriate. Surface would fit better.

attachRules for stock include srfAttach and allowSrfAttach (partially) - both missing on procedural ones.

crashTolerance = 15 seems a bit low with stock ones being 10 or 40. Maybe dropping with size (calculate): Small NC (10 kg, .625 m) has 40 (0.95 eC see below) Advanced A (75 kg, 1.25 m) has 40 (0.95 eC see below) Protective (200 kg, 2.5 m) has 10 (0.7 eC)

Missing(?) values: fuelCrossFeed (bool): should be simple to add (calculate) bulkheadProfiles (size?): should be simple to add (calculate) thermalMassModifier = 6.0: for all stock emissiveConstant = float: varies between 0.7 and 0.95 for stock (see above)