Closed Timestorm closed 8 years ago
@Timestorm From the Modders notes
PartResource is no longer derived from MonoBehaviour, PartResources are built as part of the PartSet for a vessel.
So part.Resources.dict.Clear() seems like the good way now. Aside from that, do you get ArgumentOutOfRangeException when you try to place the parts in symmetry?
I do, seems nice and broken. Let me debug it really fast >.< :-)
Well don't worry about that, I already found out and fixed the problem. I posted an issue about this yesterday. I haven't made a pull request yet because I am to be a collaborator soon and I'll merge myself.
Ok, just making sure it wasn't on my side. I personally like pull requests, it allows for collaboration.
Yes I agree with you, but if you look there still requests pending from last year, because no one at the moment is managing the mod so I didn't bother to make (another) pull requests until I will be able to maintain the mod. And also, to fix the bug I had to mess around with the code alot so I haven't yet finished to clean up. I created the issue yesterday with the aim of letting people know that it was resolved to prevent you or others wasting time debugging.
Polymaker and timestorm thanks for 1.2 this is one of my must have mods. If and when you guys have time can you take a look at my cfg file for usi- ls compatibility, it is one of the 5 pull request on file. Thanks
Hi guys, Is any of you recompiling & fixing the mod for 1.2? @Polymaker I have seen that you are developing new features for this mod. Do you have any plans to do a pre-release for 1.2 soon?
Yes I finished the corrections for 1.2 but at the moment I don't have write access to the repository. Only swamp-ig and nathanknell can merge the pull requests. And I know that nathanknell is busy for the moment (he is on the dev team)
Thanks for your hard work
Rafael A. Acevedo MAJ (P), FA
On Sep 17, 2016, at 16:47, James William Turner notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes I finished the corrections for 1.2 but at the moment I don't have write access to the repository. Only swamp-ig and nathanknell can merge the pull requests. And I know that nathanknell is busy for the moment (he is on the dev team)
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
I can too! Is there a preferred order I should merge them?
You can merge this request and I'll make a pull request for the other fixes tomorrow. (You can also merge my other request about SRBs nozzle deflection)
Done and Done. Messaged @Swamp-Ig as well, said she'd add you soon.
I've added @Polymaker :)
Thank you very much! Polyhedral shapes and Mk2/Mk3 will be coming soon!
Can you merge 208 usi-ls cfg file.
Rafael A. Acevedo MAJ (P), FA
On Sep 17, 2016, at 22:34, James William Turner notifications@github.com wrote:
Thank you very much! Polyhedral shapes and Mk2/Mk3 will be coming soon!
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
It seems PartResouce is no longer Destroyable. I changed it to .Remove(res) from partResources and removed the final cycle of Destroying PartResouce in partResources
I changed the clearing of the resource list (part.Resources.list) to clear the dictionary (part.Resources.dict)
Below are just capitalization changes that have changed in 1.2.0 part.findAttachNode -> part.FindAttachNode part.findAttachNodeByPart -> part.FindAttachNodeByPart