When running a model that with a TotalAnnualMaxCapacity of 6GW on a certain technolgy the model installs in step 4 in 2035 3 GW and in 2039 again 3 GW. So far no step had options, but the next step, step 5 has one decision with two options. However, here the run crashes at the osemosys check of ResidualCapacity and TotalAnnualMaxCapacity. The two models for step 5 both show a ResidualCapacity of 9GW, even though it should be 6, not just because of the limit but also because in step 4 there were twice 3 GW installed.
I know you are currently very time constrained, but if you have 20 minutes to spare today could you have a look @trevorb1?
Otherwise, I will give it a go tomorrow. But it seems odd to me. Had we not already looked into the logic of adding ResidualCap. and NewCap.?
When running a model that with a TotalAnnualMaxCapacity of 6GW on a certain technolgy the model installs in step 4 in 2035 3 GW and in 2039 again 3 GW. So far no step had options, but the next step, step 5 has one decision with two options. However, here the run crashes at the osemosys check of ResidualCapacity and TotalAnnualMaxCapacity. The two models for step 5 both show a ResidualCapacity of 9GW, even though it should be 6, not just because of the limit but also because in step 4 there were twice 3 GW installed.
I know you are currently very time constrained, but if you have 20 minutes to spare today could you have a look @trevorb1? Otherwise, I will give it a go tomorrow. But it seems odd to me. Had we not already looked into the logic of adding ResidualCap. and NewCap.?