Closed zhangmuElias closed 1 year ago
Hi @zhangmuElias
Thank you for reporting this! Your calculation seems right to me and the first lame coefficient should be updated. Also I agree with you that the difference in the Elastic modulus is relatively small.
Best,
Dear @keiyamamo
Good to hear it, and thanks for replying!
Best wishes ZHANG
Dear everyone,
I just found that there may be something confused me for the material settings of the benchmark case FSI3 in the case file
TF_fsi.py
The first lame coefficient is set to be 4e6 but it may should be 8e6 from the paper.Although the differences between 4e6 and 8e6 of first lame coefficient to calculate Elastic modulus is not too big, which are 5.333e6 and 5.6e6 pa.
Best regards Zhang