Open aweibuome opened 1 year ago
same maybe paper problem
Does this still occur on latest commit ?
Yes, when I ran the last submitted kaiiju server, when I set per-player-mob-spawn to true, a large number of creatures still appeared. The following is the picture
version: This server is running Kaiiju version git-Kaiiju-"68de640" (MC: 1.20.2) (Implementing API version 1.20.2-R0.1-SNAPSHOT) (Git: 68de640 on dev/1.20.2) Unknown version Previous version: git-Kaiiju-"daf406e" (MC: 1.20.2)
I can't reproduce this issue, is there any extra information ? (Biome, conditions, number of players..)
I don't know if this information is valid for you, when I upgraded to 1.20.2 for the first time( about two days ago), the number of entities was very large, and when I tried to add some content on the number of creatures in kaiiju-entity-limits.yml, like GlowSquid: limit: 500 removal: 600, Something happened, I can’t open the launcher, this is the error message ---- Minecraft Crash Report ---- // Daisy, daisy...// DO NOT REPORT THIS TO PAPER/FOLIA! REPORT TO KAIIJU INSTEAD!Time: 2023-10-13 12:14:34 Description: Exception in server tick loop
org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.SerializationException: [entities, spawning, monster-spawn-max-light-level] of type java.lang.Integer: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "default" at org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.NumericSerializers.parseNumber(NumericSerializers.java:346) at org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.NumericSerializers.lambda$static$9(NumericSerializers.java:254) at org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.FunctionScalarSerializer.deserialize(FunctionScalarSerializer.java:40) at org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.ScalarSerializer.deserialize(ScalarSerializer.java:115) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperImpl.load0(ObjectMapperImpl.java:64) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperImpl.load(ObjectMapperImpl.java:48) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperFactoryImpl.deserialize(ObjectMapperFactoryImpl.java:204) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperImpl.load0(ObjectMapperImpl.java:64) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperImpl.load(ObjectMapperImpl.java:48) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperFactoryImpl.deserialize(ObjectMapperFactoryImpl.java:204) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperImpl.load0(ObjectMapperImpl.java:64) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperImpl.load(ObjectMapperImpl.java:48) at org.spongepowered.configurate.objectmapping.ObjectMapperFactoryImpl.deserialize(ObjectMapperFactoryImpl.java:204) at org.spongepowered.configurate.AbstractConfigurationNode.get(AbstractConfigurationNode.java:151) at org.spongepowered.configurate.ConfigurationNode.get(ConfigurationNode.java:520) at org.spongepowered.configurate.ConfigurationNode.require(ConfigurationNode.java:407) at io.papermc.paper.configuration.Configurations.initializeWorldDefaultsConfiguration(Configurations.java:154) at net.minecraft.server.dedicated.DedicatedServer.initServer(DedicatedServer.java:210) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.runServer(MinecraftServer.java:1173) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.lambda$spin$0(MinecraftServer.java:343) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833) Suppressed: org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.SerializationException: [entities, behavior, zombie-villager-infection-chance] of type java.lang.Double: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "default" at org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.NumericSerializers.lambda$static$3(NumericSerializers.java:144) ... 19 more Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "default" at java.base/jdk.internal.math.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(FloatingDecimal.java:2054) at java.base/jdk.internal.math.FloatingDecimal.parseDouble(FloatingDecimal.java:110) at java.base/java.lang.Double.parseDouble(Double.java:651) at org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.NumericSerializers.lambda$static$3(NumericSerializers.java:142) ... 19 more Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "default" at java.base/java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:67) at java.base/java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:668) at org.spongepowered.configurate.serialize.NumericSerializers.parseNumber(NumericSerializers.java:344) ... 20 more
-- System Details --
Details:
Minecraft Version: 1.20.2
Minecraft Version ID: 1.20.2
Operating System: Windows Server 2022 (amd64) version 10.0
Java Version: 17.0.8, Oracle Corporation
Java VM Version: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (mixed mode, sharing), Oracle Corporation
Memory: 12629875696 bytes (12044 MiB) / 12884901888 bytes (12288 MiB) up to 12884901888 bytes (12288 MiB)
CPUs: 16
Processor Vendor: GenuineIntel
Processor Name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz
Identifier: Intel64 Family 6 Model 165 Stepping 5
Microarchitecture: unknown
Frequency (GHz): 2.90
Number of physical packages: 1
Number of physical CPUs: 8
Number of logical CPUs: 16
Graphics card #0 name: Microsoft basic display adapter
Graphics card #0 vendor: (Standard graphics card types) (0x8086)
Graphics card #0 VRAM (MB): 0.00
Graphics card #0 deviceId: 0x9bc5
Graphics card #0 versionInfo: DriverVersion=10.0.20348.1
Graphics card #1 name: Microsoft Remote Display Adapter
Graphics card #1 vendor: Microsoft
Graphics card #1 VRAM (MB): 0.00
Graphics card #1 deviceId: unknown
Graphics card #1 versionInfo: DriverVersion=10.0.20348.1
Memory slot #0 capacity (MB): 16384.00
Memory slot #0 clockSpeed (GHz): 2.93
Memory slot #0 type: DDR4
Memory slot #1 capacity (MB): 16384.00
Memory slot #1 clockSpeed (GHz): 2.93
Memory slot #1 type: DDR4
Virtual memory max (MB): 37738.02
Virtual memory used (MB): 16916.17
Swap memory total (MB): 5120.00
Swap memory used (MB): 165.05
JVM Flags: 2 total; -Xms12G -Xmx12G
CraftBukkit Information:
Running: Kaiiju version git-Kaiiju-"daf406e" (MC: 1.20.2) (Implementing API version 1.20.2-R0.1-SNAPSHOT) true
Plugins: {}
Warnings: DEFAULT
Reload Count: 0
Threads: { WAITING Worker-Main-3: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:341), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode.block(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:506), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3465), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3436), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1623), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:435), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1062), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], TIMED_WAITING Craft Scheduler Thread - 2: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:252), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$TransferStack.transfer(SynchronousQueue.java:401), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.poll(SynchronousQueue.java:903), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1061), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], RUNNABLE Signal Dispatcher: [], WAITING Worker-Main-1: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:341), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode.block(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:506), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3465), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3436), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1623), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:435), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1062), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], RUNNABLE Attach Listener: [], WAITING Worker-Main-4: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:341), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode.block(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:506), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3465), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3436), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1623), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:435), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1062), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], TIMED_WAITING Common-Cleaner: [java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:155), java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.ref.CleanerImpl.run(CleanerImpl.java:140), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833), java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.InnocuousThread.run(InnocuousThread.java:162)], WAITING Tuinity Chunk System Worker #2: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:211), ca.spottedleaf.concurrentutil.executor.standard.PrioritisedQueueExecutorThread.run(PrioritisedQueueExecutorThread.java:97)], WAITING Finalizer: [java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:155), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:176), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:172)], RUNNABLE DestroyJavaVM: [], RUNNABLE Notification Thread: [], WAITING Tuinity Chunk System Worker #1: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:211), ca.spottedleaf.concurrentutil.executor.standard.PrioritisedQueueExecutorThread.run(PrioritisedQueueExecutorThread.java:97)], WAITING RegionFile I/O Thread #0: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:211), ca.spottedleaf.concurrentutil.executor.standard.PrioritisedQueueExecutorThread.run(PrioritisedQueueExecutorThread.java:97)], RUNNABLE WindowsStreamPump: [org.fusesource.jansi.internal.Kernel32.WaitForSingleObject(Native Method), org.jline.terminal.impl.jansi.win.JansiWinSysTerminal.processConsoleInput(JansiWinSysTerminal.java:138), org.jline.terminal.impl.AbstractWindowsTerminal.pump(AbstractWindowsTerminal.java:460), org.jline.terminal.impl.AbstractWindowsTerminal$$Lambda$121/0x000001ac84118ac8.run(Unknown Source), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], TIMED_WAITING Timer hack thread: [java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method), net.minecraft.SystemUtils$7.run(SystemUtils.java:713)], WAITING Worker-Main-2: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:341), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode.block(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:506), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3465), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3436), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1623), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:435), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1062), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], TIMED_WAITING Craft Scheduler Thread - 3: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:252), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$TransferStack.transfer(SynchronousQueue.java:401), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.poll(SynchronousQueue.java:903), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1061), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], WAITING Worker-Main-6: [java.base@17.0.8/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:341), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode.block(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:506), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3465), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3436), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1623), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:435), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1062), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1122), java.base@17.0.8/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)], RUNNABLE Server thread: [java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.dumpThreads(Native Method), java.base@17.0.8/java.lang.Thread.getAllStackTraces(Thread.java:1662), org.bukkit.craftbukkit.v1_20_R2.CraftCrashReport.get(CraftCrashReport.java:33), org.bukkit.craftbukkit.v1_20_R2.CraftCrashReport.get(CraftCrashReport.java:17), net.minecraft.SystemReport.a(SystemReport.java:62), net.minecraft.CrashReport.
Force Loaded Chunks: {} Server Running: true Player Count: 0 / 88; [] Data Packs: vanilla, file/bukkit Enabled Feature Flags: minecraft:vanilla World Generation: Stable Is Modded: Definitely; Server brand changed to 'Kaiiju' Type: Dedicated Server (map_server.txt)
I deleted the configuration file and regenerated it, but it still didn't work, and I still got this error. So I opened a new archive and copied the world folder, world_nether folder and world_the_end to the new archive. Fortunately, it can be opened normally.
Some other additional information, the number of players on the server is about 10, and each player joining will add about 3,000 entities.
bukkit.yml: spawn-limits: monsters: 70 animals: 10 water-animals: 5 water-ambient: 20 water-underground-creature: 5 axolotls: 5 ambient: 15 chunk-gc: period-in-ticks: 600 ticks-per: animal-spawns: 400 monster-spawns: 1 water-spawns: 1 water-ambient-spawns: 1 water-underground-creature-spawns: 1 axolotl-spawns: 1 ambient-spawns: 1 autosave: 6000 aliases: now-in-commands.yml
I don't have any more information because I made almost no changes to the other configurations
The current solution is to set the per-player-mob-spawn option to false. After setting it to false, everything on the server is normal. This is a normal picture.
I want to know if other people who use kaiiju1.20.2 have the same problem as me. If not, maybe there is an error in my own archive,and you can close this issue.
我想知道其他使用 kaiiju1.20.2 的人是否和我有同样的问题。如果没有,也许我自己的存档中有错误,您可以关闭此问题。
same problem
让我看看你的草莓
confirmed as a folia bug
Expected behavior
Normal number of entities
Observed/Actual behavior
Too many entities, including cows, sheep, water creatures, zombie, and so on
Steps/models to reproduce
When I set the per-player-mob-spawns option in the paper-world-defaults.yml configuration file to true, although the server only has a few players online, the number of entities in an area has reached an astonishing 20,000 , cows, horses, and squids everywhere, it is impossible to kill them all. This problem does not exist in version 1.20.1. The monster spawning limit in the Bukkit configuration file is the default. When I set the per-player-mob-spawns option to false, the number of cows and sheep began to return to normal, but the refresh frequency of monsters was relatively low. This is the picture when set to true
Plugin and Datapack List
plugins: [14:47:41 INFO]: Server Plugins (27): [14:47:41 INFO]: Paper Plugins: [14:47:41 INFO]: - HuskHomes [14:47:41 INFO]: Bukkit Plugins: [14:47:41 INFO]: - AntiPopup, Backuper, BetterRTP, BlockLocker, Chunky, CoreProtect, deathmsg1.1, FarmControl, GSit, headdrop [14:47:41 INFO]: joinmsg, Kaiivoid, LuckPerms, makefly, MiniMOTD, MiraiMC, PlaceholderAPI, ProtocolLib, SeeMore, TAB [14:47:41 INFO]: Towny, TownyChat,Vault, ViaBackwards, ViaRewind, ViaVersion
Kaiiju version
Other
1.20.2 Is per-player-mob-spawn optimized? Does this option have to be disabled? If it is not disabled, the number of entities will be abnormally large, but there is no such problem in 1.20.1