KairoiAI / An_Incomplete_History_of_Research_Ethics

The text for https://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/1753034/A-History-of-Research-Ethics/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
19 stars 1 forks source link

Light bulb Moment 💡 Mary Astell on "custom" #21

Open Ismael-KG opened 3 years ago

Ismael-KG commented 3 years ago

Title

Mary Astell on "custom"

Elevator Pitch

Surely epistemic injustice wasn't just invented in 2007! Whilst Fricker's work has helped focus discussions of epistemic injustice, we can trace a term on the subject back to 1697: bad custom (see Samantha Forbes, 2019, 2020).

Justification

The social structures that frame human interaction have often been ignored in analyses of human life. An important development for our better understanding of the social world was Fricker's identification of testimonial and hermeneutical injustice. The broader idea of epistemic injustice was already a concern for Astell, who, in 1697, analysed the technical term "custom" (1697). It is important to note that Astell did not use the term "bad custom" (Samantha Forbes, 2019: 779), but the distinction between a good and bad custom is an important one that she provides (ibid., referencing Detlefsen, 2016: 78)).

Unformed Thoughts

"Custom as the Philoso∣pher well observed is no small matter: It is the most difficult thing imaginable to recall our Thoughts and withdraw the Stream of our Affections from that Channel in which they were used to flow" (Astell, 1695: 231-214; cited by Samantha Forbes, 2019: 799).