KairoiAI / An_Incomplete_History_of_Research_Ethics

The text for https://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/1753034/A-History-of-Research-Ethics/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
19 stars 1 forks source link

Conceptualisation πŸ–ŠοΈ Res Ipsa Loquitur #92

Open Ismael-KG opened 2 years ago

Ismael-KG commented 2 years ago

Title

Res Ipsa Loquitur

Date or Period πŸ“…

1863, as per Fridman (1954: 233) and the fact that the term was coined in the Byrne v Boadle Barrel Case of 1863 (see Webb, 2007).

Elevator Pitch

A legal term coined in Liverpool, England, helps with the assignation of responsibility.

Justification

Unformed Thoughts

Webb (2007) links the rise of res ipsa loquitur to the development of "enterprise liability" (ibid.: 1068).

As a non-expert in the field, this still seems relevant to modern discussions about responsibility in "black boxes," or algorithms that "make decisions" following unintelligible "logical" sequences.

Casey (2019) speaks of "robot ipsa loquitur." It seems more a play on words than anything, as it means "let the robot speak for itself" and Casey insists on the utility of the many logs that "robots" keep. But still, from my limited understanding, it seems that res ipsa loquitur allows us to assign fault.

Part of the point of this story will be to show that: