DEN (+ ICE) - Several issues with Denmark

Quick questions HOI4 version: 1.10.4 Kaiserreich version: 0.16.1, public, beta

Describe the change you would like, and explain the reasoning behind this change:

[x] 1. The starting fleet should at least separate the submarines from the surface fleet.
Reason: some newer players may forget to separate the submarines from the surface fleet, which ends up slowing down the entire fleet, as the fleet's speed equals the slowest vessel's speed (at least in hoi4).
[x] 2. DEN's division name groups should not be shared by ICE.
Reason: Danish language is part of the East Scandinavian language subfamilily whereas the Icelandic is part of the West Scandinavian language subfamily. Also, some (if not most or all) of Danish division names use Sjællandske and Jydske as prefixes, which means "Sjælland" and "Jylland," respectively.
[x] 3. Hvalrossen Class, Søridderen Class, and Tumleren Class templates should be merged into a single template.
Reason: All of these templates use same modules and same hull.
[x] 4. Ægir Class and Rota/ Daphne Class templates should be merged into a single template.
Reason: All of these templates use same modules and same hull.
[x] 5. Niels Iuel II Class template must either be fixed or be deleted.
Reason: There's no historical document justifying this ships existence and the template has 2 escort cruiser battery modules mounted.
[x] 6. DEN must start with Weltkrieg Heavy Hull researched.
Reason: Denmark starts with 2 Nassau/Helgoland Class battleships.
[x] 7. common\units\names\00_DEN_names.txt should be fixed.
Reason: Some of the names don't match with history\units\DEN_naval.txt, such as Gorm being available as a name of an aircraft carrier even though the name is occupied with 2 battleships, one named Gorm and another named HDMS Gorm (#13888 #13890 ).
[x] 8. Denmark should start with an air force, even though the size will most likely be miniscule.
Reason: even though the Danish Air Force was founded in 1950, its predecessors (Danish Army's air force and the Danish Navy's air force) were founded in early 1910s, which is way before the PoD of Kaiserreich (https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A6rens_Flyvertropper
https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinens_Flyvev%C3%A6sen).
[x] 9. Division name groups should not be tied to DEN_INF_01. -Reason: No other tags does this, and tying the name groups to DEN_INF_01 will cause chaos for those who like to organize divisions' names.
[x] 10. Some of the names in DEN_INF_01, such as "Jydske Division" and "Slesvigske Division" should be in its own division name group.
Reason: The rest of the division (8th division and beyond) specify that they are infantry divisions, whereas the 1st to 7th divisions does not mention that but instead show which region they are from and/or assigned to.
[x] 11. Some of the names in DEN_INF_01, namely "Prinsens Division," "Livgarden," "Dronningens Livgardedivision" should be in its own division name group.
Reason: These three divisions are literally royal guards divisions, and the German counterparts have its division name group (%d. Garde-Division).
[x] 12. One of the names in DEN_INF_01 (7. Bornholmske Forsvars Div.) should EITHER have its own division name group (Forsvars Div.) OR be renamed to 7. Bornholmske Division.
[x] Reason: The current garrision divisions' name group imply that they are regiments rather than they are divisions. As 10. states, however, this division could just change its name to 7. Bornholmske Division to fit the new division name groups.
[x] 13. DEN_CAV_01 should be fixed;
EITHER change the in-game name to Dragondivision
OR change the names to be %d. Dragonregiment, change the DEN_CAV_01's name to Cavalry Regiment instead of Cavalry Division, and make a new name group for Cavalry Divisions.
Reason: DEN's starting cavalry "division" is more of a regiment rather than a division. However, considering that players can upgrade it to 10w or 20w, there should be a new name group for that, or at least fix the current name group to imply that possibility.
[x] 14. DEN_CAV_01's Livgarden til Hest (21st cavalry division) should EITHER be removed OR have its own division name group.
Reason: See 11.
[x] 15. DEN_MOT_01's 10. Motoriserede Hær Korps (10th motorized division) should change its name to 10. Motoriserede Infanteridivision.
Reason: Should a player make 10th motorized infantry division, it will be a division, not a corp.
[x] 16. DEN_MOT_01's 1st-9th division names should be in its division name group or be deleted.
Reason: See 10.
[x] 17. DEN_MOT_01's 23rd division Motoriserede Infanteridivision 'København' should be changed to %d. Motoriserede Infanteridivision 'København' and become the first motorized division.
Reason: It is the only division with a nickname in DEN_MOT_01 and the pre-existing 1st-9th motorized divisions will be moved to have its own division name group (see 16.).
[x] 18. DEN_MEC_01's 1st-9th division names should be in its division name group or be deleted.
Reason: See 10. and 16.
[x] 19. DEN_MEC_01's 24th division (Livgardens Armerede Korps) should EITHER be removed OR have its own division name group.
Reason: See 11. and 14. Also, see 15. in regards to the usage of "Korps."
[x] 20. DEN_MEC_01's fallback name should be changed to Armerede Division from Bælte Division.
Reason: "Bælte" means belt in Danish (https://www.dict.com/?t=dk&set=_endk&w=B%C3%A6lte), and the name "Armerede Division" is already used in DEN_MEC_01, albeit as Armerede "Korps" rather than a "Division."
[x] 21. DEN_MEC_01's 10th division %d. Armerede Korps 'Christian IV' should be changed to %d. Armerede Division 'Christian IV' and become the first mechanized division.
Reason: See 17., 18, and 20.
[x] 22. DEN_ARM_01's fallback name and division names should be %d. Panser Division instead of %d. Panser Korps.
Reason: See 15.
[x] 23. DEN_PAR_01's 21st division Faldskærmsdivisionen 'Ørnene' should be changed to %d. Faldskærmsdivisionen 'Ørnene' and become the first parachute division.
Reason: See 17; also, it should be mentioned that the rest of the divisions' names are the same names generated by the fallback name.
[x] 24. DEN_MAR_01's 21st division Frømandskorpset should not exist at all.
Reason: Frømandskorpset was formed in 1957 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frogman_Corps_(Denmark)).
[x] 25. DEN_MTN_01's 25th division Jægerkorpset should not exist at all.
Reason: Jægerkorpset was formed in 1961 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaeger_Corps_(Denmark)).
[x] 26. DEN_MTN_01's 26th division Sirius should not exist at all.
Reason: There's no division named Sirius during 1910s-1940s in OTL and before PoD, and the closest thing I found (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius_Dog_Sled_Patrol) was formed in 1941 (which is after PoD), which only consists of 14 men.
[x] 27. DEN_GAR_01's 1st-7th divisions and 21st, 22nd, and 27th divisions should change their name as the same as the fallback name.
Reason: Their names are same as 10., 11., and 12., and will confuse players.
[x] 28. DEN_GAR_01's fallback name should be %d. Garnison Division instead of %d. Garnisonregiment.
Reason: Hoi4's units are divisions, not regiments.
[x] 29. DEN_idea_opposition_controlled_landsting (idea) should be less harsh.
Reason: at the start of the game, SocDems (the ruling party) starts with 43% popularity, which makes it close to become the majority.
[x] 30. Denmark should start with a core on Northern Schleswig.
Reason: Northern Schleswig had majority of Danes during 1930s OTL and also in KRTL unless there's an ethnic clensing (which goes against PDX's ToS).
[x] 31. Denmark should start with a claim on Schleswig.
Reason: It is historically ruled by the Danes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Schleswig). However, considering that there are more Germans than Danes in that state, I decided to suggest it as a claim of Denmark instead of a core.
[x] 32. den.87 (event) should give pp, not lose pp.
Reason: Getting a trade deal for other countries give pp as well.
[x] 33. Lockdown and strike events should be fire less frequently.
Reason: otherwise, Denmark player/AI will suffer at least 5% consumer goods with significant amount of pp loss, and would tire Denmark player out.
[x] 34. DEN_agreement_with_germany (focus) should be deleted.
Reason: wasting 70 days on a focus that gives an opinion modifier to GER and guaranteed pp loss is not a good idea in general, not to mention that as Denmark the opinion with Germany will either be great (in a faction and in a war together) or be terrible (GER invades DEN).
[x] 35. Emergency fund for Iceland should not last 3000 days long.
Reason: Iceland should be out of the Black Monday by 3-4 years if they blunder, and will take less time on the economic recovery if they don't blunder.
[x] 36. DEN_devalue_the_krona (focus) should not result in pp loss or at least less pp loss.
Reason: Political power is not a currency, so weakening Krone should not result in pp loss. Also, Denmark already suffers chronic pp loss from events (see 33. and 34.).
[x] 37. Denmark's Intelligence Agency's name should be Rigspolitiet.
Reason: See den.17 (event). Also, Denmark AI/player does not have enough civilian factories to upgrade anything other than counterintelligence measures, unless a player uses console and types annex ALL.
[x] 38. den.17 (event) should result in the formation of the DEN's Intelligence Agency.
Reason: other countries can form intelligence agencies via events, and as DEN it is quite hard (if not impossible) to form an Intelligence Agency without building way too many civs.
[x] 39. DEN_steinckes_reforms (focus) should not result in increase in consumer goods.
Reason: See 9. of #13896
[x] 40. Recovering from a financial crisis should take less time in general. -Reason: other countries with weaker economy can be free from the economic crisis even faster than Denmark. In fact, the countries that takes a long time to recover (even if the focuses are rushed) are either coded by Thomahawk, or (SA rework)
[x] 41. DEN_hybrid_regime (focus) branch should EITHER:
not exist at all;
focus more on being a government in exile; OR
have shorter times to complete
Reason: Usually GER AI ignores DEN even after they left the Reichspakt and the 2WK. Also, even if GER invades DEN, it takes at most a week to capitulate Denmark, making this "hybrid regime" branch basically impossible to complete before being capitulated.
[x] 42. DEN_strengthening_investor_confidence (focus) should not increase consumer goods as a result.
Reason: having more consumer goods modifier as a result of strengthening investors' confidence does not make sense at all, unless there were implications of corruptions, which is not the case (see DEN_strengthening_investor_confidence's loc files).
[x] 43. DEN_strengthen_the_krona (focus) should not result in pp gain.
Reason: See 36.
[x] 44. DEN_cut_subs (focus) should not result in a -10% MarkLib popularity.
Reason: unless cutting subsidies' efforts are in vain (which is not the case, according to DEN_cut_subs's loc files), cutting subsidies should show economic recovery, not a decrease in a party's popularity.
[x] 45. DEN_limit_union_activity (focus) should result in -10% Syndie popularity, not +10% Syndie popularity.
Reason: See loc files of DEN_limit_union_activity (focus).
[x] 46. DEN_support_nordisk_film (focus) and DEN_reinvigorate_danish_cinema (focus) should be 35 days long.
Reason: FRA's counterpart takes 35 day to finish.
[x] 47. DEN_unconventional_warfare (focus) should not result a malus without a bonus.
Reason: taking this focus forces Denmark players to take DEN_form_jaegerkorpset (focus), and railroading focuses will result in DEN being less enjoyable. Also, taking 70-day focus just to get a malus is not a good idea.
[x] 48. DEN_purchase_new_equipment (focus) should not result in pp loss.
Reason: CHI's counterpart (and other countries' focuses that gives infantry equipment as well) does not result in pp loss.1
[x] 49. DEN_expand_the_army_airforce (focus) and DEN_expand_the_navy_airforce (focus) should not be mutually exclusive and the loc files should be changed as well.
Reason: Denmark actually needs both the Army's airplanes (CAS and Tacs) and the Navy's airplanes (Naval bombers) to defend the country, not one over the other. Also, DEN_establish_flyvevabnet (focus) mentions the Army's Air Force being merged with the Navy's Air Force.
[x] 50. DEN_build_aircraft_carrier (focus) should result in Denmark having an aircraft carrier as well, even if it gives an aircraft carrier a year later by an event.
Reason: basically this is how Dominican Republic and Sweden gets their flagship as well.
[x] 51. DEN_carrierbased_planes (focus) should explain more clearly.
Reason: most people does not read the game files and will be confused whether or not researching a certain thing is a good idea.
[x] 52. DEN_acquire_battleship (focus) should result in Denmark having a battleship as well, even if it gives an aircraft carrier a year later by an event.
Reason: See 50.
[x] 53. DEN_one_submarine_a_time (focus) and DEN_pack_tactics (focus) should result in submarine defence bonus and malus, respectively, instead of screen defense bonus and malus, respectively.
Reason: Read the loc files of DEN_one_submarine_a_time (focus) and DEN_pack_tactics (focus).
[x] 54. DEN_model_monarchy (focus) should NOT result in pp malus.
Reason: the description imply that the Danish Monarchy is as stable as it can get, and therefore should not result in pp malus.
[x] 55. DEN should have two expansionist paths; one for PatAut, and one for NatPop.
Reason: den.5 already forshadows the possibility of expansionist Denmark.

Additional context or comments:

There were other issues regarding the starting fleet, but are already fixed (#13888 #13890 #13892 )
There are many things cut out from this list of suggestions/bugs.
Some of the "suggestions" are actually bugs I found, but decided to use "Suggestion" as the main label because there are more suggestions than bugs, or at least I think so. I'd appreciate it if anyone with edit permissions to add "Bug" label as well.

Kaiserreich / Kaiserreich-4-Bug-Reports

DEN (+ ICE) - Several issues with Denmark #13974