search

KaitlinMS / sodchat

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/sodchat
0 stars 0 forks source link

Closing message window ignores all subsequent messages #20

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Start a collaboration
2. Close a window on one side
3. Send message from the other side

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected: Hard to know, because if it's just a 1-on-1 then the window
should just pop back up. If it's a multi-user collaboration, maybe it
should be rejoined by the user.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by adrian20...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2009 at 4:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by adrian20...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2009 at 4:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
related to double click issue 19

Original comment by adrian20...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2009 at 5:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Obviously very hard to fix, so low priority

Original comment by adrian20...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2009 at 5:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hmm...yeah, add this to a wish list if there is one lol.

Basically I designed it to work this way for a couple reasons:

1) It was easiest lol
2) Requires less network interaction when joining chats
3) There would be no other way to leave a chat without adding additional gui 
stuff

Basically right now when you're invited to a chat the host doesn't care if you 
got
the message or not. It doesn't wait for a response at all. It's up to you to
accept(join) or join on your own. This minimizes network back and forth and just
makes the starter of a collaborations job easier lol

BUT while typing that here are some cool doable features:

1) While joining a chat, invite some other people from your contact list to 
join with you
2) ....Ugh, I forgot already. I'll post it if it comes to me lol

Original comment by Randel...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2009 at 5:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Not possible without some slightly major reworking. It can be done on our
arcitechture but it would require some planning on my part...and I'm too lazy.

Original comment by Randel...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2009 at 10:15