Kanaksinh / gtalksms

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/gtalksms
0 stars 0 forks source link

Phone fails to find contact if phone number is not tagged as 'mobile' #221

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
===  LOG  ===
GTalkSMS Preferences
notifiedAddress: bazcraig@gmail.com
useDifferentAccount: true
useGoogleMapUrl: true
locale: default
smsMagicWord: GTalkSMS
manuallySpecifyServerSettings: true
batteryNotificationInterval: 10
serviceName: gmail.com
showStatusIcon: true
markSmsReadOnReply: true
notificationIncomingSmsType: same
notifyBatteryInStatus: false
login: barrydcraig@gmail.com
notifySmsDelivered: false
debugLog: true
smsNumber: 5
connectOnMainscreenShow: false
notifySmsSent: false
callLogsNumber: 10
roomPassword: gtalksms
serverHost: talk.google.com
serverPort: 5222
mucServer: conference.jwchat.org
notifyApplicationConnection: false
notifyIncomingCalls: false

GTalkSMS Version: 3.2
Android API: 10
Kernel info: 2.6.35.14-LeeDrOiD-Pyramid-V3.2.0--g48c0885
lee@lee-laptop )
#12 SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 14 21:31:19 BST 2011

--------- beginning of /dev/log/system
--------- beginning of /dev/log/main
09-19 11:25:38.957 I/gtalksms( 5889): Update presence: bazcraig@gmail.com - 
Online
09-19 11:25:44.552 I/gtalksms( 5889): SmsReceiver: got new sms intent, calling 
RetrieveMessages
09-19 11:25:44.562 I/gtalksms( 5889): SmsReceiver: Issuing service intent for 
incoming SMS. sender=+447803006862 message=Straight into the bank to pay off 
t...
09-19 11:25:44.562 I/gtalksms( 5889): onStartCommand(): Intent 
com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.SMS_RECEIVED
09-19 11:25:44.562 I/gtalksms( 5889): handling action 
'com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.SMS_RECEIVED' while in state Connected
09-19 11:25:44.572 I/gtalksms( 5889): 
com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.SMS_RECEIVED: number=+447803006862 
message=Straight into the bank to pay off the overdraught  roomExists=false
09-19 11:25:44.572 I/gtalksms( 5889): Sending message "SMS from Martin Craig: 
Straight int..."
09-19 11:25:44.572 I/gtalksms( 5889): handled action 
'com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.SMS_RECEIVED' - state now: Connected
09-19 11:25:53.761 I/gtalksms( 5889): Update presence: bazcraig@gmail.com - 
Online
09-19 11:26:21.748 I/gtalksms( 5889): XMPP packet received - sending Intent: 
com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.XMPP.MESSAGE_RECEIVED
09-19 11:26:21.748 I/gtalksms( 5889): onStartCommand(): Intent 
com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.XMPP.MESSAGE_RECEIVED
09-19 11:26:21.748 I/gtalksms( 5889): handling action 
'com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.XMPP.MESSAGE_RECEIVED' while in state Connected
09-19 11:26:21.748 D/gtalksms( 5889): onCommandReceived(): "sms:martin 
craig:You're a party ani..."
09-19 11:26:21.848 I/gtalksms( 5889): Sending message "No match for "martin 
craig"" to bazcraig@gmail.com/Retouch-0021723072
09-19 11:26:21.848 I/gtalksms( 5889): handled action 
'com.googlecode.gtalksms.action.XMPP.MESSAGE_RECEIVED' - state now: Connected
================================

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Change the 'type' of phone number on any contact from 'mobile' to 'work'
2. Attempt to send a message via the "sms:contact" command (sms:reply will 
still work)

What is the expected output?

message will be sent to named contact

What do you see instead?

"No match for ...."

Additional informations:
Phone model: HTC sensation

Original issue reported on code.google.com by bazcr...@gmail.com on 19 Sep 2011 at 10:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by Florent....@gmail.com on 19 Sep 2011 at 1:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Should be easy to implement. I'll have a look at the Contacts Resolver next 
week.

Original comment by fschm...@gmail.com on 19 Sep 2011 at 2:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by fschm...@gmail.com on 27 Sep 2011 at 4:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
This issue was closed by revision d87ed7d9ef18.

Original comment by fschm...@gmail.com on 2 Nov 2011 at 7:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Fixed and published with 3.3

Original comment by Florent....@gmail.com on 11 Nov 2011 at 9:47