soc-pe-bot
commented
1 year ago Team's Response
Our UG examples follow a flow. In this case, the find sea shop command was used in the previous command example therefore the user would know what it does.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: User do not have to read the user guide in sequence. User may go through the table of content and just go to the command they require. When we reach the view page, the only example given is "find sea shop followed by view 1".
In the diagram given in the original post, there are only 2 pictures, before view 1 is pressed and after view 1 is executed and information of find sea shop is not given. The find sea shop command will confuse user on how Shopback is the only item found after that command is executed. Hence, user will have to go to the find command page to learn about the command first before understanding how view works. This will cause minor inconvenience for the user. Instead if the find command is not included or find Shopback is use it will make the user guide clearer and not confuse the user since find sea shop is not intuitive.
The user maybe confused to what find sea shop do. Maybe a clearer way is find shopback. Since user can skip the find command