Besides #134, I caught another similar issue:
[SDP-IDP33] says:
By virtue of this profile’s requirements, an IdP’s metadata MUST contain:
an element at the role level containing
at least one element
alternately, the element(s) MAY instead reside in an element at the root () level
Because the first bullet-point quoted here (md:Extensions) sits at the
same (top) level as the one about md:IDPSSODescriptor, it does not
nest the Extensions into the role descriptor, and it instead reads as
being at the top (EntityDescriptor) level.
However, the third-nested bullet-point ("Alternatively") assumes the
role descriptor was meant by the text quoted above and says "or
alternatively, can be at the top level".
Minor wording inconsistency - it should be clear what was meant about
overall placing of md:Extensions - whether inside a Role descriptor or
at the top level EntityDescriptor.
Hi,
Besides #134, I caught another similar issue: [SDP-IDP33] says:
Because the first bullet-point quoted here (md:Extensions) sits at the same (top) level as the one about
md:IDPSSODescriptor
, it does not nest the Extensions into the role descriptor, and it instead reads as being at the top (EntityDescriptor) level.However, the third-nested bullet-point ("Alternatively") assumes the role descriptor was meant by the text quoted above and says "or alternatively, can be at the top level".
Minor wording inconsistency - it should be clear what was meant about overall placing of
md:Extensions
- whether inside a Role descriptor or at the top level EntityDescriptor.Cheers, Vlad