Closed Ryex closed 1 year ago
I removed it not long ago, figured it was unnecessary when you can set the password via the settings. Does it bring any other advantage?
The main one would be to not have a plaintext password hanging around in the settings file.
Well, it's not secured in any form, but even if I add PAM support back in I'll still have it work for users who don't have PAM installed via the password in the settings file as I wouldn't want to add another dependency
I was under the impression that PAM wasn't installed on most systems, but that seems to be wrong so I've switched over to PAM and removed the previous method.
yea. PAM is kinda fundamental to the account architecture of linux
it would be nice to at least have the option to use PAM for the lockscreen password
https://github.com/RMTT/lua-pam/
arch has an aur package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-pam-git