Reading: TMS evoked response vs networks

Here goes:

Neuromaps: A growing library of brain annotations (node-wise)

should help with explaining regional variability of the nodes in the network beside that related to network topology
comes with a python package: https://netneurolab.github.io/neuromaps/
Markello, R. D., Hansen, J. Y., Liu, Z.-Q., Bazinet, V., Shafiei, G., Suárez, L. E., Blostein, N., Seidlitz, J., Baillet, S., Satterthwaite, T. D., Chakravarty, M. M., Raznahan, A., & Misic, B. (2022). Neuromaps: Structural and functional interpretation of brain maps. Nature Methods, 19(11), 1472–1479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01625-w
also this review: Bazinet, V., Hansen, J. Y., & Misic, B. (2023). Towards a biologically annotated brain connectome. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 24(12), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-023-00752-3

Application of brain networks and brain maps to explain stimulus propagation

looks at intracranial stimulus + response
methodological inspiration for the TMS/EEG
Seguin, C., Jedynak, M., David, O., Mansour, S., Sporns, O., & Zalesky, A. (2023). Communication dynamics in the human connectome shape the cortex-wide propagation of direct electrical stimulation. Neuron, 111(9), 1391-1401.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.01.027

SC-FC coupling changing in time

would this work for early vs late TMS response?
Liu, Z.-Q., Vázquez-Rodríguez, B., Spreng, R. N., Bernhardt, B. C., Betzel, R. F., & Misic, B. (2022). Time-resolved structure-function coupling in brain networks. Communications Biology, 5(1), 532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03466-x

SC-FC coupling in the context of MEG

complement to SC-FC papers dealing with MEG (better cousin of EEG)
can we reuse some of the data features (how to evaluate FC) for EEG?
Liu, Z.-Q., Shafiei, G., Baillet, S., & Misic, B. (2023). Spatially heterogeneous structure-function coupling in haemodynamic and electromagnetic brain networks. NeuroImage, 278(120276), 120276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120276

TMS response vs SC

An example on how variance in TMS response over different stimulated areas can be related to SC
Momi, D., Ozdemir, R. A., Tadayon, E., Boucher, P., Di Domenico, A., Fasolo, M., Shafi, M. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Santarnecchi, E. (2021). Perturbation of resting-state network nodes preferentially propagates to structurally rather than functionally connected regions. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90663-z

Katterrina / fimuni_thesis