Closed RagnarGrootKoerkamp closed 3 years ago
While the code may technically be wrong here, it feels like it would cause more confusion than clarity to have test data directories that are named "x.in" or "y.ans".
I agree, but ran into this when adding testcases for BAPCtools. What do you think is a reasonable stricter spec for testgroup names? Since currently the spec does allow this.
See title. The check for missing
.ans
files should probably check that the.in
files are actually files and not directories.