GNOME Core Apps List - Githubissues

Kazhnuz / awesome-gnome

A curated list of awesome apps, extensions, modules, themes and tools for the Gnome Desktop Environment.

Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal

1.16k stars 47 forks source link

GNOME Core Apps List #27

Open lokesh-krishna opened 7 years ago

lokesh-krishna commented 7 years ago

Found this today: https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2017/08/13/gnome-3-26-core-applications/

Should help us in avoiding ambiguity regarding which apps are classified as core GNOME apps and which aren't.

Here is the entire list as it is right now:

Archive Manager (File Roller)
Boxes
Calculator
Calendar (gnome-calendar, not california)
Characters (gnome-characters, not gucharmap)
Cheese
Clocks
Contacts
Disk Usage Analyzer (Baobab)
Disks (gnome-disk-utility)
Document Viewer (Evince)
Documents
Files (Nautilus)
Fonts (gnome-font-viewer)
Help (Yelp)
Image Viewer (Eye of GNOME)
Logs (gnome-logs, not gnome-system-log)
Maps
Music
Photos
Screenshot
Software
Simple Scan
System Monitor
Terminal
Text Editor (gedit)
To Do
Videos (Totem)
Weather
Web (Epiphany)

Kazhnuz commented 7 years ago

Nice ! It'll provide good guidelines to mark Core application.

Kazhnuz commented 7 years ago

I'm working on the "gnome-core" branch on adding references to this list. I'm trying to find if there is a place where they auto-update the list.

lokesh-krishna commented 7 years ago

Seeing how that document refers to the previous update, which too was a similar blog post accompanying the release of GNOME 3.22, I think there isn't a separate auto-updating list that.

What we can do is revisit this issue every 6 months (each GNOME release) and see if a new list has been posted. We could mention the changes here and then add any new apps to the contribution guidelines.

Kazhnuz commented 6 years ago

Yep, I didn't find one. I'll try to add in the branch all the core apps in the list this week-end. Should we add in parenthesis the "development" name like "Files (Nautilus)" ?

lokesh-krishna commented 6 years ago

Hmmm...
I think it would be okay to do that. What do you think?

Kazhnuz commented 6 years ago

I just feared a bit that it could make the list a bit cluttered, but we have longer names, so it might be fine.

Kazhnuz commented 4 years ago

Seems like the GNOME project is talking about this question right now, and it might give us a good set of guidelines : https://discourse.gnome.org/t/official-proposal-how-we-define-gnome-software/3371