Closed wadoon closed 3 months ago
I am sorry. I do not understand the purpose of this PR.
Attention: Patch coverage is 13.33333%
with 13 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 37.87%. Comparing base (
cde763f
) to head (5b2dfe3
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
...rc/main/java/de/uka/ilkd/key/pp/PrettyPrinter.java | 13.33% | 9 Missing and 4 partials :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
If I understand this PR correctly, I am against merging this PR. Comments in the term view would clutter the view unnecessarily and do not add much, in my opinion.
Intended Change
In #3400, we extend the pretty printing of Java AST by a service object. This enables new pretty printing thingies like showing availability of specification for certain objects: loops and blocks.
It uses a comment![image](https://github.com/KeYProject/key/assets/104259/37a5f1a6-6a42-4f87-addd-0f6fd6f6cfb6)
/*C*/
: