Closed JeffLCoughlin closed 5 years ago
Re Aldebaran: I do wonder if you want to include a section titled "What has changed since the first processing?", because some users will have this perspective. You can then copy paste it into a blog post, too!
I def. plan to put that in the upcoming blog post (working on one for C2/C13/C3), but I wanted the main DRN to be 'clean', i.e., just describe the final processing. Thinking of users down the road I don't want to confuse them too much with past processings, just "here's the data, here's the notes for that data". So only if Aldeberan did cause a visible effect in the data after reprocessing do I think it should go in the notes.
C13 DRN look good. I think they are good to go.
Updated C13 Data release notes:
Requesting Doug to sign-off on merge. Besides spelling/wording checks, the only thing I was questioning was whether to mention the Aldeberan issue and fix, but, it didn't seem like there would be anything noticeable at the end to the user, so not worth actually mentioning. What do you think Doug?