As a white hat hacker, I want a method to prove that I have found a bug using zero-knowledge proofs without revealing the solution so that I can be compensated fairly, ensuring confidentiality, and incentivizing cybersecurity across all industries.
Acceptance Criteria
[ ] System supports the creation and submission of zero-knowledge proofs by white hat hackers.
[ ] System can evaluate the validity of zero-knowledge proofs without exposing the underlying bug details.
[ ] Upon successful validation, the system should automatically trigger a pre-determined compensation mechanism.
[ ] The compensation amount is commensurate with the severity and impact of the proven bug.
[ ] White hat hackers remain anonymous throughout the validation process.
[ ] The process supports various types of bugs, ranging from common vulnerabilities to complex, industry-specific issues.
[ ] Evaluation of proofs and compensation occurs in a timely manner to ensure prompt payments.
sequenceDiagram
participant W as White Hat Hacker
participant S as Submission System
participant V as Verification System
W->>S: Submit zero-knowledge proof
S->>V: Validate proof without bug disclosure
V-->>S: Validation result
alt If Proof Valid
S->>W: Trigger compensation mechanism
else Proof Invalid
S->>W: Request for additional information
end
Compensation Mechanisms And Fair Pricing Models
As a white hat hacker, I want a method to prove that I have found a bug using zero-knowledge proofs without revealing the solution so that I can be compensated fairly, ensuring confidentiality, and incentivizing cybersecurity across all industries.
Acceptance Criteria