The specification currently refers to near-identical enum values with both KHR_DF_* and KDF_DF_* prefixes:
KDF_DF_MODEL_UASTC
KHR_DF_MODEL_UASTC
KDF_DF_MODEL_ETC1S
KHR_DF_MODEL_ETC1S
Is this intentional? I'd be happy to make a PR if not. Just found a bug in my code resulting from copy/pasting these values and ending up with two names for the same thing. Thanks!
The specification currently refers to near-identical enum values with both
KHR_DF_*
andKDF_DF_*
prefixes:Is this intentional? I'd be happy to make a PR if not. Just found a bug in my code resulting from copy/pasting these values and ending up with two names for the same thing. Thanks!