Open bashbaug opened 3 months ago
What asciidoctor version are you using? Looking at a HTML rendered locally with Asciidoctor 2.0.16 (the version suggested by the repo README) the title renders correctly
What asciidoctor version are you using?
Odd, I'm using 2.0.16:
$ asciidoctor -V
Asciidoctor 2.0.16 [https://asciidoctor.org]
Runtime Environment (ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux-gnu]) (lc:UTF-8 fs:UTF-8 in:UTF-8 ex:UTF-8)
What command line are you using to build the specs locally? I'm basically using a command line like the one from our CI: python3 makeSpec -clean -spec khr OUTDIR=out.khr -j 12 html
.
My setup is
$ asciidoctor -V
Asciidoctor 2.0.16 [https://asciidoctor.org]
Runtime Environment (ruby 2.3.3p222 (2016-11-21 revision 56859) [x86_64-linux]) (lc:UTF-8 fs:UTF-8 in:UTF-8 ex:UTF-8)
I was using, $ make html
, but with $python3 makeSpec -clean -spec khr OUTDIR=out.khr -j 12 html
I still see an okay rendering:
@alycm Could you try this out?
@EwanC, @alycm (and any others), do you have any more thoughts what might be causing the difference?
I have a workflow that does automated spec builds using the Khronos docker image and this also seems to render the table title incorrectly, for whatever that's worth.
The table title for:
... is rendering incorrectly in the HTML spec, at least for the version of asciidoctor that I am using to build the specs. The PDF spec looks fine.
We should either figure out what's happening with it, or rephrase the table title so it renders correctly.