Closed bashbaug closed 5 years ago
Ping @oddhack, any concerns with this PR?
Looks fine.
I could tweak the registry index to redirect links for these extensions to the asciidoctor spec, though I'm not sure it's worth the trouble.
though I'm not sure it's worth the trouble.
I agree, it's not worth the trouble, and I think the signposts provide more information than a link to the asciidoc spec source anyhow.
If there are no remaining issues or concerns can this PR be merged?
This pull request modifies the plaintext KHR extension specs for
cl_khr_icd
,cl_khr_d3d10_sharing
, andcl_khr_gl_sharing
.All KHR extensions are currently described in the OpenCL extensions spec. These three extensions are unique, since they also have individual, plaintext extension specs on the registry.
Rather than keeping the individual, plaintext extension specs in sync with the definitions in the OpenCL extensions spec, this pull request replaces the plaintext extension specs with signposts to the OpenCL extensions spec (and the corresponding asciidoc sources), which are now the normative specifications for these extensions.