Closed SunSerega closed 2 years ago
Group note: To be completely honest I really don't like that group names contain extension vendor names, as in pretty much every instance they have been reused elsewhere in the spec, often by a different vendor or in the core spec itself which makes the vendor suffix confusing at best (e.g. see BufferTargetARB which is a cornerstone of modern OpenGL)
I really don't like that group names contain extension vendor names
Same. I finally changed my code-generators a few days ago to remove them, mostly because of ProgramPropertyARB
and such. And what I've then got in logs:
WARNING: Groups [ConvolutionTargetEXT] had different enums from [ConvolutionTarget]
WARNING: Groups [SeparableTargetEXT] had different enums from [SeparableTarget]
WARNING: Groups [HistogramTargetEXT] had different enums from [HistogramTarget]
WARNING: Groups [MinmaxTargetEXT] had different enums from [MinmaxTarget]
WARNING: Groups [SamplePatternEXT] had different enums from [SamplePattern]
WARNING: Groups [ColorTableTargetSGI] had different enums from [ColorTableTarget]
WARNING: Groups [VertexArrayPNameAPPLE] had different enums from [VertexArrayPName]
WARNING: Groups [VertexAttribEnumNV] had different enums from [VertexAttribEnum]
WARNING: Groups [ShadingRateQCOM] had different enums from [ShadingRate]
WARNING: Groups [HintTargetPGI] had different enums from [HintTarget]
This is the next thing I want to look into. But only after #520, because I already noticed that changes of #521 are painfully incompatible with #520 because they both add groups to the same enums in multiple places...
Though PixelTexGenMode
(the only relevant here group) doesn't have the vendor name at the end, so I'm not sure why are you writing it here...
P.S. Ah nevermind, I see now, I merged PixelTexGenMode
into PixelTexGenModeSGIX
in that pull...
https://opensource.apple.com/source/X11libs/X11libs-60/mesa/Mesa-7.8.2/src/glx/apple/specs/enumext.spec.auto.html
Note Extension #126
.
Extension #126
is this:
https://www.khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/extensions/SGIX/SGIX_impact_pixel_texture.txt
This is the extension text I used when in this commit of #520. And it has:
But not:
I guess that means these 2 enums were defined in some sort of draft, but then removed from extension while forgetting the registry?
Sounds plausible. Please feel free to post a PR to fix this.
GL_PIXEL_TEX_GEN_ALPHA_REPLACE_SGIX
andGL_PIXEL_TEX_GEN_ALPHA_NO_REPLACE_SGIX
were added in the first commit of this repo. And they are contained in thePixelTexGenMode
group, which is only used forglPixelTexGenSGIX
, but I can't find any reason why these enums should be accepted.Relevant spec I found: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenGL-Registry/blob/91aa993da3cc9e7ea1eecf3075de8c03d9a15d09/extensions/SGIX/SGIX_pixel_texture.txt#L130-L131 https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenGL-Registry/blob/91aa993da3cc9e7ea1eecf3075de8c03d9a15d09/extensions/SGIX/SGIX_impact_pixel_texture.txt#L41-L47