Closed SunSerega closed 1 year ago
Link to the original issue for completeness: #545
Hearing no objections from the WG, this is approved to merge.
@NogginBops I think you forgot to regenerate the headers after this change. It means the extension header and the XML are in conflict as to the type of this function.
@NogginBops I think you forgot to regenerate the headers after this change. It means the extension header and the XML are in conflict as to the type of this function.
Sorry, meant to attn @SunSerega
I think @oddhack might be able to fix this more quickly?
I think it was explicitly asked not to include header changes in the PR, to avoid conflicts between PRs. And the headers here are just one version of OpenGL bindings. So like any other bindings, it can be a bit behind the XML.
Maybe we should also touch this since related function got changed?