Closed qbojj closed 2 weeks ago
You're right, this is an inconsistency, and it's not intended. In fact, as none of those structures will ever hold dynamic storage, the move constructor of the vk::StructureChain doesn't give you anything beyond the plain copy construction. Therefore, the move constructor will be removed.
Resolved by #1949.
The vk::StructureChain has deleted move assignment even when it has defined move construction. Is this intended? And if so, why?