Cleaned up the entries that had things like "viewer, embeddable, self-hosted" as their type to use these words as individual strings
Updated the live-link in the README to use HTTPS
During that: noticed that many entries use HTTP instead of HTTPS
Changed all the links to use HTTPS by default
Noticed that some of these entries are actually dead links
Wrote a tool that reads the projects data JSON and tries to contact all links, to see whether they are 404
Noticed that I'm in a rabbit hole...
Ignored that...
Fixed several links and descriptions that caused 404's or have otherwise been outdated...
I guess somebody has to do something like this, occasionally. It still raises the question about how such "maintenance" can be done for larger project databases. E.g. one of the links led to some dubious site that smelled like malware for me, so I just removed it. Other entries may be outdated in other ways (even if the link is not a 404). But that probably has to be sorted out elsewhere.
"viewer, embeddable, self-hosted"as theirtypeto use these words as individual stringsI guess somebody has to do something like this, occasionally. It still raises the question about how such "maintenance" can be done for larger project databases. E.g. one of the links led to some dubious site that smelled like malware for me, so I just removed it. Other entries may be outdated in other ways (even if the link is not a 404). But that probably has to be sorted out elsewhere.