Closed jkriege2 closed 7 years ago
@jkriege2 this is a huge effort! Well done.
I would like to see some consistency with regard to naming convention.
The package size is currently designated as (e.g.)
l10.0mm_d3.0mm
package6.0x3.6mm
w10mm_h5mm
I would suggest simply using (e.g.) _5.0x3.2mm
without any extra words e.g. "package".
Also, sometimes you specify pin-count before package size, and sometimes after. Please use the same convention for all!
Great work otherwise :)
OK, the names are more consistent now:
-**P**pin_**W**x**h**mm
_w**W**mm
_h**H**mm
_d**D**mm
_l**L**mm
. This is necessary to accomodate the different measure of a (generally) not-rectangular package ... e.g. for round it would not be really clear whether 3x10mm
is 3mm diameter and 10mm length, or vice-versa ... Anything else?
Best, JAN
PS: 3D packages have been renamed and some more round 3D models were added (see https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library/pull/868)
Hi!
if you have time: please also review these, as they are connected (Oscillators, but use the same scripts!):
Best & Thanks, JAN
Fantastic work once again.
Browsing through these I see a couple of 3D models that are misalinged:
Apart from that it looks very good.
Hi!
I updated the footprints again and fixed those issues (also by adding new 3D models, see: https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library/pull/868)
Ready to merge?
cu JAN
Yep I think we are good to go. Fantastic :)
Screenshots show most (but not all variants!) of the new/updated footprints: