Open ChristianHirsch opened 4 years ago
How about Package_LGA
Thanks for your answer @cp-aquila, but what about Converter_DCDC
?
I took a closer look:
XCL101
is a DCDC converter. I don't expect any other device (outside that series) to fit on the same footprint.Converter_DCDC
has mostly isolated DCDC converters. But there are also some non-isolated variants in there. It is mixed already and would allow a new non-isolated part.Converter_DCDC
that is as small as the XCL101
XCL101
is basically a LGA partPackage_LGA
does have the Texas_SIL0010A_MicroSiP-10-1EP_3.8x3mm_P0.6mm_EP0.7x2.9mm_ThermalVias
which is similar to the XCL101
Unfortunately non of the above findings provide a really strong argument for either one of the library.
There was a similar discussion at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/pull/2083. The ultimate reasoning was basically to go by package type if there's a distinct name for it and a possibility that it's going to be used with other parts. This case here isn't quite the same, though.
I'd like to add the [CL-2025] (https://www.torexsemi.com/file/CL-2025-02/CL-2025-02-pkg.pdf) footprint, e.g., for a XCL101 DC/DC convert. But to which library fits this footprint to?