Closed matthijskooijman closed 6 years ago
Please move the NC pin as indicated below to make it harder to connect to it by accident
PS: Would you also redo the 2 remaining symbols
Thanks, JAN
I just pushed an update to this PR. I:
As far as I'm concerned, this PR is ready for merging.
If these are connectors then they should be moved into a connector lib. The connector symbols have already been moved over to the new repo. I would suggest you add them to the Connector_Specialized lib in the kicad-symbols repo.
The MCU repos libs should only hold the micro controllers.
Ah, didn't realize the symbols also moved to a new repo. I'll create a new PR there, and move the symbols to the other lib at the same time.
I think the connector lib already has some jtag connectors. So some of these might be duplicates of symbols already in there.
@poeschlr, I moved these changes over to https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/pull/39. Thanks for pointing out the other JTAG symbols. They are not duplicates (different pin numbers between AVR and ARM), but I did match the pin layout, so the AVR version can be interchanged with the 10-pin ARM version more easily.
I'm closing this PR, as it is superseded by the new one.
This redesigns the AVR-ISP-10 and AVR-JTAG-10 symbols to be compliant with the current KLC. It basically uses the same layout as previously used for AVR-ISP-6 (see #1736).
Just like with AVR-ISP-6, there's a few checklib warnings that seem acceptable to me (I cannot find any official docs about these pinouts to link to, and since the power pins can be either input or output, depending on how the connector is used, I used "passive" for all pins).
For AVR-JTAG-10, I'm not entirely sure if the VREF pin should be seen as a power pin and be at the top, or if it should be at the side?