Kicksecure / security-misc

Kernel Hardening; Protect Linux User Accounts against Brute Force Attacks; Improve Entropy Collection; Strong Linux User Account Separation; Enhances Misc Security Settings - https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Security-misc
https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Impressum
Other
518 stars 51 forks source link

why kick secure uses frozen release cycle distribution debian instead of fedora or arch linux. #106

Closed evil-user closed 2 years ago

evil-user commented 2 years ago

frozen release cycle distributions often don’t update package versions and fall behind on security updates.

For frozen distributions, package maintainers are expected to backport patches to fix vulnerabilities (Debian is one such example) rather than bump the software to the “next version” released by the upstream developer. Some security fixes do not receive a CVE (particularly less popular software) at all and therefore do not make it into the distribution with this patching model. As a result minor security fixes are sometimes held back until the next major release.

Debian is worst in handling security i wish kicksecure was based on fedora or arch linux.

adrelanos commented 2 years ago

Because:

evil-user commented 2 years ago

@adrelanos i am wondering why almalinux or rockylinux were not mentioned in https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/Operating_System#Criteria_for_Choosing_a_Base_Distribution , i guess they both use rpm/(dnf in almalinux 9.0) both are highly secure and have large user base even from enterprise. they could have been a better alternative compared to debian. debian is full of politics and their popularity is diminishing day by day the number of debian derivatives doesn't mean lots of public scrutiny most of them are just fun projects not serious enough for enterprise.