Closed khchul closed 3 months ago
Thank you for your great work! I've been looking through your paper and the implementation, but I have a question regarding the scaling. In the paper, it is said that "Each input channel X(i) is first individually normalized to have zero mean and unit standard deviation". I understood that this is done in the TimeLLM's normalize_layers. However, the data itself has already been scaled through data_loader.py and as far as I know, inverse_transform() doesn't seem to appear elsewhere. Shouldn't the scale variable in the data_loader be set to False?
Thank you for your attention. We are currently using the framework template in TSLib. At present, the comparisons for these well-acknowledged benchmarks are all conducted after normalization. You can refer to TSLib for more information.
Thank you for your great work! I've been looking through your paper and the implementation, but I have a question regarding the scaling. In the paper, it is said that "Each input channel X(i) is first individually normalized to have zero mean and unit standard deviation". I understood that this is done in the TimeLLM's normalize_layers. However, the data itself has already been scaled through data_loader.py and as far as I know, inverse_transform() doesn't seem to appear elsewhere. Shouldn't the scale variable in the data_loader be set to False?