This tool enables the fact-checking of Wikidata items by verbalizing claims and gathering HTML reference resources utilizing various language models. Please refer to the ProVe API through the link provided below.
[More API options] Some users would like to submit batches of items and obtain the analysis of the references associated with those items (OR), perhaps integrate with PagePile?
[More API options] Users also mentioned the need to provide similar support in Wikipedia (OR, JK).
[Related to Worklists] Publishing ProVe results on Wikidata server in a form of RDF triples to enable access to these things via SPARQL server (JK).
[Related to Worklists] In Worklist, some users would like specific items and the inclusion of the reference score there to help them prioritize the work. How best to handle this? (OR)
We can publish the results of ProVe, and the users can query Wikidata items with the ProVe results via SPARQL query in order to make a Worklist according to their interests (JK).
Plus, giving scores in each item in Worklist.
[Improving ProVe results] LLM usage for problematic triples and items and explainable results (JK).
Wishlist
[More API options] Some users would like to submit batches of items and obtain the analysis of the references associated with those items (OR), perhaps integrate with PagePile?
[More API options] Users also mentioned the need to provide similar support in Wikipedia (OR, JK).
[Related to Worklists] Publishing ProVe results on Wikidata server in a form of RDF triples to enable access to these things via SPARQL server (JK).
SPARQL Query Example
WikiProject Missing Creator
[Related to Worklists] In Worklist, some users would like specific items and the inclusion of the reference score there to help them prioritize the work. How best to handle this? (OR)
[Improving ProVe results] LLM usage for problematic triples and items and explainable results (JK).