Open leplatrem opened 6 years ago
Related as pointed out by Ethan:
I feel on some level that the problem here is that our settings are a giant dict of str -> setting and not something more hierarchical, but changing that in the config file would probably be a much bigger undertaking. I almost wonder if this could be cleaned up by running a preprocessing step on all settings to turn them into something more hierarchical.
Another part of the problem is that you don't know what the possible collection names are until a request comes in. Maybe a possibility is to fetch signers on-demand rather than instantiating them on startup, but I guess that would turn startup configuration problems into request-time configuration issues. Yuck.
Some settings are obtained using a currified event listener function (
resources
,to_review_enabled
etc.). The signer is obtained via therequest.registry.signers[key]
attribute.There might be some ways to simplify and «unify» this.