Open KKould opened 8 months ago
It seems that IndexScan will not be used, because the the calculated cost is None
(StatisticsMeta
file is not found, only Analyze
can generate these files, but Analyze
may have something wrong)
Analyze table t;
ERROR: there are more buckets: 100 than elements: 0
It seems that IndexScan will not be used, because the the calculated cost is
None
(StatisticsMeta
file is not found, onlyAnalyze
can generate these files, butAnalyze
may have something wrong)Analyze table t; ERROR: there are more buckets: 100 than elements: 0
@crwen
Index arranges data in ascending order, so when OrderBy...ASC, is it possible to remove the Order Operator and convert SeqScan to IndexScan (it cannot be executed if IndexScan has already used other indexes)
https://github.com/KipData/FnckSQL/issues/187#issue-2214992372
Tips: Analyze Table can only be created when the amount of data is greater than 100. Maybe I need to make the information more user-friendly. If you want to use alert table, you can execute benchmark and the internal data will have an index.
Tips: IndexScan
only makes sense based on large amounts of data. if not, there is not much difference with SeqScan
. At the same time, Index data is arranged in ascending order. You can refer to the test cases here to understand the execution of index.
https://github.com/KipData/FnckSQL/blob/main/tests/slt/where_by_index.slt
Feature Request
When
OrderBy .. Limit ..
exists, theTopK
operator will be usedTips:
TopK
should also use index