Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I don't understand why connecting to YouTube and casting a YouTube through SDK
is a requirement; YouTube app does that for you if you want to cast a YouTube
video. It is like asking for being able to launch and use Hulu+ using APIs. If
you have a pointer to an mp4 video from YouTube, you can directly cast that but
otherwise, YouTube is an app like any other app.
Original comment by anad...@google.com
on 10 Feb 2014 at 4:40
Alright, makes sense. I was just curious since i could do that with preview sdk
version. To be honest it could be a good use case in demand from lot of users
in future. Youtube is like a repository, lot of apps narrow down to specific
types of videos which they might want to chromecast via their apps.
Original comment by mailtopu...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2014 at 4:48
I agree that it is an attractive use case but the correct way of implementing
that is not to treat YT differently in the SDK; SDK should treat all apps the
same way, instead it is the YT app that should/could provide additional
functionalities to enable that use, case. In other words, this can be a feature
request for the YT app and not SDK.
Original comment by anad...@google.com
on 10 Feb 2014 at 5:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mailtopu...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2014 at 4:15