Consider PRs to prismatic/schema?

[ccann]

This looks really useful! Nice work and thanks!

I'm wondering if the long term goal is to maintain this as a separate library or to try to port some of the refined functionality into Schema itself? There are a few other schema "utility" libraries out there too like metosin/schema-tools and I can envision them unified back into Schema or into one ultimate schema++ library.

Either way, thanks! something to consider

[kachayev]

Hello Cody,

Thanks for reaching out and many thanks for your feedback! We're glad you like it!

Regarding pulling this functionality back to schema: it's always a trade-off. I mean, pretty significant one:

• on the one hand, we gain adoption, use cases, more testing and, overall, achieve a better level of basic tooling

• on the other hand, we would be restricted with schema's releases cycle and would not be able to keep our own development pace (which is huge right now as we still have a lot of todos, ideas, experiments etc).

So, for now, we stick to the development here, in a separate library. In case we have a lot of attention from the community, we will obviously talk to schema's maintainer in order to find a common ground!

[ccann]

Sounds like a great way to move forward. I'll definitely be giving this a shot soon.

[kachayev]

Sure thing @ccann! Tell us how it goes and if this works for you, any feedback would be super valuable for us!