codecov[bot]
commented
17 hours ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 72.22%. Comparing base (
ed80dc3) to head (d1479b9). Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #977 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 71.94% 72.22% +0.27% ========================================== Files 36 36 Lines 6666 6642 -24 ========================================== + Hits 4796 4797 +1 + Misses 1870 1845 -25 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/KittyCAD/cli/pull/977/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=KittyCAD) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/KittyCAD/cli/pull/977/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=KittyCAD) | `72.22% <ø> (+0.27%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=KittyCAD#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
We aren't even using the relevant code. If we need it in the future, we can add it back in.