Closed KlementineJBS closed 11 months ago
Changing plan for reduction - instead of lith-al, will try this two-step reduction via the ethyl acetate product. (Lith-al risks overreduction to secondary alcohol).
See lit references 1, 2 and 3.
Ref 3 uses absolute benzene so probably not ideal. Ref 1 and 2 both use potassium tert-butoxide and do a two-step synthesis, isolating the intermediate. Ref 1 has higher yield for first step (98%), ref 2 has higher yield for second step (70%).
TLC indicated SM was consumed but two products had formed.
30% ethyl acetate in hexane
Vial: 15.8618 Full vial: 16.2334 Mass: 371.6 mg (1.53 mmol, 66%)
Evidence of desired product: 266.15 [M+Na]+, 242.05 [M-H]-, 507.20 [2M - 2H + Na]-.
Other peaks: 224.13 (+), 425.11 (+), 427.12 (+), 354.13 (-).
H NMR indicates that product has formed in reasonable quantity, but some impurity is present - integrals don't quite make sense and some extra peaks are present.
Peaks at 4.34, 4.22, 1.22 indicate ethyl acetate/propanoate portion of molecule.
Problem peaks include: 6.54 (minimal), 4.56, 3.43, 1.49
Code | Fractions | Vial tare | Mass (mg) | Identity | Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 9 - 16 | 15.6596 | 148.9 | product | 27% |
B | 16 - 23 | 15.8320 | 71.6 | product/messy | 13% |
C | 24 - 32 | 16.1312 | 155.9 | unknown | - |
F9: evidence of product - 244.14 [M+H]+, 266.12 [M+Na]+, 509.05 [2M + Na]+.
F25: unknown compound believed to have mass of 201 - 202.14 [M+H]+, 224.13 [M+Na]+, 425.10 [2M + Na]+.
NMR results are interesting.
A and B have peaks at 8.31, 8.28 and 8.19, 8.16, 8.13 while C has 3 peaks at 8.37, 8.33, 8.30 and 8.21, 8.18.
A and B have the same singlet at 4.36 and quartet at 4.20. C lacks these and instead has a quartet at 4.57.
A and B have two singlets at 3.44 and 3.75 but they are much larger in B - solvent impurity? C lacks these.
All have singlet at 2.27. C has a triplet at 1.50.
KBS35-1 A_1.zip KBS35-1 B_1.zip KBS35-1 C_1.zip KBS35-1 column.pdf
Link to HIRAC.
Reaction scheme
Outcome
148.9, 27%