Closed KlementineJBS closed 2 months ago
Some evidence of mono-product, not sure what peaks at 313.19+, 777.23+, 856.94 (3+) 1133.90 (4+) or 975.20- mean.
856.94/3 = 285.65, 1133.90/4 = 283.48,
triphenylphosphine oxide = 278.29 (+Cl = 313 but this would be negative)
TLC's from yesterday afternoon and this morning indicate some formation of new compound, but little consumption of either SM. (SM used in TLC is KBS43).
Fractions | Tare (g) | Mass (mg) | Substance |
---|---|---|---|
8-10 | 15.5673 | 11 | junk |
11-14 | not isolated | ||
15-45 | 15.6767 | 159.8 | mono product |
61-105 | 15.6561 | 190.7 | bis:mono 1:4 |
W1 | 15.6763 | 147.9 | bis product |
W2 | 15.6191 | 75.2 mg | unknown - thought was azide but has no 2200 peak on IR |
Note these masses are far too large - presumably still contain solvent.
Realised that if bis product is present in F61-105, that is probably the dominant species in W1. Lower spot believed to be PPh3O - tried to remove by tritutation with ether but product is still slightly impure. Need to measure mass.
Link to HIRAC and master page #174.
HIRAC KBS48 Mitsunobu reaction on linear amines.docx
Reaction scheme
Outcome
147.9 mg (0.164 mmol, 82%)