Closed KlementineJBS closed 6 months ago
TLC indicated reaction was progressing, but unsure what spots correspond to what. Ideally, reaction should occur twice at terminal amines. SM was consumed.
Turned off stirring and left overnight awaiting MS analysis.
Eluent was 10% MeOH in DCM with NH4OH, stained with ninhydrin.
Evidence of desired product, 502.205+ [M+H]+ as well as over-nosylated product 685.15- [M-H]- , 709.01+ [M+Na]+ and 721.06- [M+Cl]-. Unsure about 239.23+, 201.98-, 788.08+, and 888.05(4-). 888 possibly an adduct of nosyl chloride?
Tried to collect precipitate by vacuum filtration but washing with cold water resulted in product dissolving. Ended up collecting small amount of solid precipitate and performing a liquid-liquid on the filtrate (3 x 40 mL DCM) to obtain a sticky yellow oil/gel.
Assuming that desired product can still be easily be protonated but over-nosylated product cannot. Try doing LLE with lightly basic solution e.g. Na2CO3, or manipulate at low pH to remove overnosylated product.
Tried a second extraction on the filtrate collected previously. Dissolved in chloroform (50 mL) and acidified with 50 mL HCl (0.1 M).
Aqueous layer was then basified to ~ pH 14 using NaOH (2.5 M) in the hopes of precipitating out product. Adding base seemed to result in increased dissolution of a small amount of white precipitate.
Aqueous layer was then extracted with chloroform (3 x 30 mL), dried and rotovapped.
During process, a considerable amount of white-yellow solid stuck to the sep funnel and could not easily be removed with water or organic solvent. Using acetone, this was removed and characterised separately. It did not dissolve easily in any solvent attempted except DMF.
2nd extract vial: 15.8852 mass: 5.8 mg
residue vial: 15.9801 mass: 544.9 mg
TLC analysis suggests that it contains at least one of the products (top spot) with a tiny amount of the bottom spot also present.
(E = extract, R = residue. Same solvent system as above.)
Suggests that both products contain amines with some level of nosylation. Hopefully MS will shed more light.
KBS50-1 second extraction and residue.pdf
nmr300_20240307_KBS50-1 2nd extract_1.zip nmr300_20240306_KBS50-1 filtrate_10 (1).zip
Shows that both second extract + residue contain bis and tris nosylated amine.
Reference | Evidence of bis nosyl product | Evidence of tris-nosyl product | Other | TLC spots |
---|---|---|---|---|
second extract | 500.09- [M-H]- and 502.06+ [M+H]+ | 685.04- [M-H]- | none | C, D, E |
third extract | - | - | - | A, B, C |
residue | 502.05+, 500.09- | 685.08- and 709.05+ | none | C, E |
ppt | 502.04+ and 500.06- | none | 539.98+, 581.19+ | A, C, E |
(Assume that A, top spot, is nosyl chloride)
KBS50-1 residue.pdf KBS50-1 ppt.pdf KBS50-1 second extract.pdf KBS50-1 second extract.d.zip
Realised that it's actually probably better to use the tris-nosyl amine as this prevents the inner amine from reacting. Previously, the nosyl group was intended to increase nucleophilicity of the terminal amines, but in a Mitsunobu reaction the internal amine can react equally well as the protected terminal amines.
Filtered out white precipitate from aqueous layer and also reduced down CHCl3 layers.
Precipitate was yellow and crystalline, and reduced chloroform extracts foamed up significantly.
Precipitate:
precipitate vial: 15.8257 mass: 150.1 mg
third extract vial: 15.8251 mass: 929.6 mg
TLC'd to determine what products are in what. Noted in table above.
Still hard to determine nature of products without separation, but third extract and ppt are clearly "cleaner" than earlier attempts.
Will likely just reattempt this and try to force to completion.
KBS50-1 four products.pdf nmr300_20240313_KBS50-1 ppt_10.zip nmr300_20240313_KBS50-1 third extract_1.zip
Better photo of different products by TLC - used 4.5% MeOH, 0.5% NH4OH and 95% DCM.
Link to HIRAC and master page #157
KBS43 - Nosyl protection of linear diamine .docx
Reaction scheme